>     1. List 3 aspects/elements/things that *you* would consider in
>     defining quality in museum exhibitions generally. (I am interested in
>     what you *personally* think)


a)  Addresses topic with timely and accurate information
b)  Addresses topic in a way that appeals both visually and intellectually
c)  Resonates fully with the unique mission of the institution


>
>     2. What is your area of work (eg design, education, evaluation,
>     conservation, curatorial, etc)?
>

Curatorial.


>     3. Has your institution done any work in this area?


No, but we have given great thought ourselves to defining the word "quality"
as it applies to contemporary art (our exhibition focus)--i.e., what
determines what is of "good" quality vs. "bad" quality?  We have not yet
come to any conclusions, so don't all email me for our results.  If someone
is interested in opening the discussion to the list, please feel free.