MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Nancy S. Powell" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 5 Aug 2003 18:45:07 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (67 lines)
Currently I am working parttime as a curator for an fledgling nonprofit
collecting institution. They previously instituted exactly the same
alteration to the numbering system that you are proposing. It is a mess.
Don't do it!

I have 30 years of experience in museums and in collections management and I
agree with the other List Serv members.

Just go with the standard useage of the 3-part numbering system as they have
described it, which is how it is outlined in the books they recommended.
This is a tried and true method. Any tinkering with it with just result in
confusion for you and staff/volunteers. Trying to reinvent the wheel here
will just get everything tangled-up.

Nancy Powell

----- Original Message -----
From: "Traci Langworthy" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 10:28 PM
Subject: numbering system for small historical society


> Hello,
>
> I am a trustee for a small historical society in upstate NY that is just
> beginning to formally accession the various items it has acquired since
its
> establishment in 2000. I am spearheading the process and hope I might get
> some advice from the get-go on the best way to number our objects. I
> thought it would be a no-brainer to go with the simple 3-number system I
> have read about and seen in use. But, in pondering (perhaps too much!)
> about it, I have been considering a couple of options for the middle
number
> referring to the donor/source, especially. It made sense to me, initially,
> to have a unique number for each donor/source that would be used again and
> again in future years (if or when they donated other artifacts). Has any
> other small institution tried this and found success/failure? From what I
> can tell, it seems most institutions wipe the slate clean and begin with
#1
> again each year. Any thoughts are much appreciated!
>
> Thanks very much,
> Traci Langworthy
> Sheridan, NY Historical Society
>
> =========================================================
> Important Subscriber Information:
>
> The Museum-L FAQ file is located at
http://www.finalchapter.com/museum-l-faq/ . You may obtain detailed
information about the listserv commands by sending a one line e-mail message
to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "help"
(without the quotes).
>
> If you decide to leave Museum-L, please send a one line e-mail message to
[log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "Signoff
Museum-L" (without the quotes).
>

=========================================================
Important Subscriber Information:

The Museum-L FAQ file is located at http://www.finalchapter.com/museum-l-faq/ . You may obtain detailed information about the listserv commands by sending a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "help" (without the quotes).

If you decide to leave Museum-L, please send a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "Signoff Museum-L" (without the quotes).

ATOM RSS1 RSS2