MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Heather Perry <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 18 Sep 1998 13:22:14 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
I’ve been working on our collections recently, and had a question
which I hoped someone out there may be able to help me with!
When I began the work few of the objects had accession numbers.  I’ve
been assigning numbers using the three part    year.collection.item
   system (eg 98.04.01) and everything was going fine until I
discovered artifacts from an excavation which took place on site here.
Along with some of the more interesting objects such as military
buttons and coins, there are hundreds of pieces of ‘junk’ eg tiny
shards of glass, broken pieces of nails etc. I don’t want to have to
give a separate number to each item, but I don’t know of  any
acceptable alternative. This is the only archaeological collection we
are ever likely to have - we don’t store collections from other sites.
We had considered giving all archaeological objects the year number 60
 (which will be difficult to mix up with other year numbers as we
opened in 1990 and plan to change to a four digit year number in the
year 2000). Then give each type of object a collection number (eg all
glass given the number .01), only giving an item number to
‘interesting’ pieces - such as those with manufacturers marks.
What system do other people use for cataloguing their archaeological
collections? I would appreciate any suggestions!

Thanks!
Heather.





_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2