MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Indigo Nights (Gayle)" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 27 Jul 2005 06:21:54 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (73 lines)
This message was sent to you by [log in to unmask], 
as a service of The Seattle Times (http://www.seattletimes.com).

Comments from sender: For the evolution/intelligent design crew.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Science and religion: Scopes to Kennewick
Full story: http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/editorialsopinion/2002404021_kmaned27.html








EIGHTY years after the Scopes trial dealt a blow to the anti-evolution movement, a similar face-off between science and religion is slated tomorrow in the U.S. Senate.

This time the issue is whether to preserve the right of science to discern the stories of the earliest Americans or to accede to beliefs of some Native American tribes that all ancient remains belong to them -- even when there is no provable connection.

An action against science could stall the court-ordered study of Kennewick Man, the 9,300-year-old remains stored at the University of Washington's Burke Museum.

Science should win again.

The Senate Indian Affairs Committee hearing likely won't draw 1,000 spectators, as crowded around the Dayton, Tenn., courthouse for the trial of high-school teacher John Thomas Scopes, accused of illegally teaching evolutionary theory. But the debate no doubt will be as passionate as that rendered by William Jennings Bryan, for the prosecution, and Clarence Darrow, for the defense.

At issue now is whether to amend the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act with the addition of two words: "or was." So the act would redefine Native American to be "of, or relating to, a tribe, people, or culture that is ... or was ... indigenous to the United States."

That means modern-day tribes could claim the remains from ancient tribes that long since moved on or died out -- even remains of their ancestors' foes.

The proposed change is in response to last year's unequivocal federal rulings that scientists should be able to study Kennewick Man. When the skeleton was found in 1996 on federal land, the government quickly moved to repatriate the remains to four tribes that claimed them. Eight leading scientists sued and won. This month, they are studying the remains for the first time.

The tribes argued their oral histories say they always have been in the Northwest and contain no references to visitors -- contrary to scientific evidence of widespread migration.

The federal courts sided with science, finding none of the Act's required proof of a connection to the tribes. Republican Sen. John McCain's proposed amendment would remove that burden of proven affiliation.

Supporters of the change say it won't affect Kennewick Man's study, but that is disingenuous nonsense. If the amendment is enacted, a new claim could be filed on the grounds Congress clarified its intent. Regardless, it would apply to other ancient remains with no link to modern tribes.

Science won in 1925 when the Tennessee Supreme Court overturned Scopes' conviction and dismissed the case. But it could be losing in 2005. Anthropologists report many students are opting to do graduate work outside the United States because it is increasingly hard to get access to old bones.

The Indian Affairs Committee should follow the advice of Scopes, a willing scapegoat in the test case 80 years ago: "The best time to scotch the snake is when it starts to wiggle."

======================================================================

TO SUBSCRIBE TO THE SEATTLE TIMES PRINT EDITION	
Call (206) 464-2121 or 1-800-542-0820, or go to 
https://read.nwsource.com/subscribe/times/

HOW TO ADVERTISE WITH THE SEATTLE TIMES COMPANY ONLINE
For information on advertising in this e-mail newsletter, 
or other online marketing platforms with The Seattle Times Company, 
call (206) 464-2361 or e-mail [log in to unmask]

TO ADVERTISE IN THE SEATTLE TIMES PRINT EDITION
Please go to http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/contactus/adsales
for information.

======================================================================
For news updates throughout the day, visit http://www.seattletimes.com
======================================================================

            Copyright (c) 2005 The Seattle Times Company

                        www.seattletimes.com
                       Your Life. Your Times.

=========================================================
Important Subscriber Information:

The Museum-L FAQ file is located at http://www.finalchapter.com/museum-l-faq/ . You may obtain detailed information about the listserv commands by sending a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "help" (without the quotes).

If you decide to leave Museum-L, please send a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "Signoff Museum-L" (without the quotes).

ATOM RSS1 RSS2