MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Marybeth Tomka <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 6 Apr 2006 06:56:55 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (72 lines)
I want to put my two cents in on the discussion of Past Perfect versus
Access.  There are two main differences between the two programs and I
think preferences for each come from the personality of the individual
choosing and then building the database.  I fully admit I am a data hog
and control freak.  The programs such as RE:Discovery and Past Perfect
to an extent frustrate me because I am not a programmer and therefore
don't understand how the modules interface.  Whereas, in Access I build
the relationships.  So Access fulfills my need to control and
understand.

I used a trial version of Past Perfect and found it to have all the
wonderful little things that you need to track a collection, but lacking
the ability to go further.  Now, of course, that was some time ago and I
really didn't try very hard, so no poison darts if it does more things
now.

With Access I have created a database that links my collections'
inventory, the accession files, the reports associated with the
collections, and the state permits that triggered those investigations.
It is rather large file and contains many tables, queries, data entry
forms, a switchboard, etc.  I also use it in conjunction with mail
merges in excel and word to produce invoices, box lists, accession
documents, etc.  I am sure that I could have a similar system in another
program, but having the control to create what I want when I want it is
the flexibility  I need.  Oh, and how many collections, artifacts do I
track this way?  Our accessions number just over 1200, and we probably
have on the order of several  million archaeological artifacts which
doesn't always include counts of snail shell, mussel shell, burned rock,
nor account for the mass of storage space taken up by soil samples.

In summation, its an individual choice of what system to use.  My only
caveat would be make sure whatever you choose you can migrate the data
into another system if necessary.

Cheers,

Marybeth

Marybeth S.F. Tomka, M.A.
Laboratory Director and Curator 
Center for Archaeological Research 
The University of Texas at San Antonio 
(210) 458-7822 
Fax (210) 458-4397 
http://car.utsa.edu/

. . . herding cats in a forest of catnip . . . 


-----Original Message-----
From: Museum discussion list [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
Behalf Of MUSEUM-L automatic digest system
Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 11:01 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: MUSEUM-L Digest - 4 Apr 2006 to 5 Apr 2006 (#2006-96)


6. Past Perfect vs. Access... (7)
 

------------------------------

End of MUSEUM-L Digest - 4 Apr 2006 to 5 Apr 2006 (#2006-96)
************************************************************

=========================================================
Important Subscriber Information:

The Museum-L FAQ file is located at http://www.finalchapter.com/museum-l-faq/ . You may obtain detailed information about the listserv commands by sending a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "help" (without the quotes).

If you decide to leave Museum-L, please send a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "Signoff Museum-L" (without the quotes).

ATOM RSS1 RSS2