MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
SOHS Collections Department <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 4 Dec 1997 16:46:50 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
I have used Clapham's Beeswax Polish and Renaissance Wax on furniture
over the years and like both products. They are mico-crystalline based
waxes. My husband, the furniture maker, says that they are better than
butcher's wax which is much heavier in solvents, i.e. more petroleum in
it vs. the beeswax bases in the other products. He also says that
butcher's wax is very soft, so it shows fingerprints and collects/shows
dust more because it is so soft. Does this help you decide?

Henry B. Crawford wrote:
>
> Friends,
>
> What are the current thoughts on using Butcher's Wax on wood furniture in
> the collection.  We have several cans of the stuff, and I'm wondering if
> they still need to be kept on hand.  Is it still considered good for use on
> clean finished surfaces or not?  I am sure the opinions received will vary
> from yea to nea, and everywhere in between.  I can pretty well predict what
> some will say.  I am not just looking for yes and no answers, but some real
> constructive advice on it's properties, merits, and disadvantages.
>
> TIA
>
> HBC
>
> *****************************************
> Henry B. Crawford        Curator of History
> [log in to unmask]     Museum of Texas Tech University
> 806/742-2442           Box 43191
> FAX 742-1136             Lubbock, TX  79409-3191
>                WEBSITE: http://www.ttu.edu/~museum
> **********    "Living History Rules!!"    **********

ATOM RSS1 RSS2