MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jay Heuman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 10 Aug 2004 15:48:39 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (74 lines)
Hi Deb,

There's nothing really to "counter."  Yes, some museums have tons of
visitors whether they are free or not.  I was pointing out the challenge
based on the local, regional or state "mindset".  It's a point worth
noting on this issue of free admission versus charging.

Naturally, we all know The Smithsonian museums and London's varied
state-supported museums are repositories of some of the world's greatest
treasures, are well-known, are located in cities known for cultural
offerings to which tourists flock specifically for those cultural
offerings, and have permanent residents with higher than average
educations.

It's a different story in most places.  We do alright at the Nora Eccles
Harrison Museum of Art . . . but nothing like the museums you mention
for the very reason that the mindset and value system are different
here.  Here, if something is free, some people *will* ignore it as
inconsequential.  I've actually heard people say that -- so I'm not
making it up, nor am I being a "voice of doom."

Sincerely,

j heuman, Education Curator
Nora Eccles Harrison Museum of Art
Utah State University
4020 Old Main Hill
Logan, UT  84322-4020
t 435.797.0165 | f 435.797.3423
 
Education costs money, but then so does ignorance.
Sir Charles Moser, b. 1922
 


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Museum discussion list 
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Deb Fuller
> Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 2:27 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Museum Attendance Trends
> 
> --- Jay Heuman <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> > Lower admissions might attract more people.
> > Depending upon the museum's location (local, regional and state 
> > mindset) and type (art, history, science, etc.), free admission can 
> > sometimes lead people think "It's not worth seeing if it's free." 
> > Trust me . . . uphill battle for this modern & contemporary art
> > museum in northern Utah.
> 
> I'd counter that. The Smithsonian, which has the highest 
> attended museums in the US and is among the highest attended 
> museums in the world has never charged admission. You'll pay 
> to $12(!) to park at the Dulles Annex and pay for parking at 
> the Zoo but you don't have to shell out a dime to get in the door.
> 
> When I went to the British Museum, the National Portrait 
> Gallery in the UK, and the York Minster, I happily paid over 
> the suggested donation because I thought the experience was 
> well worth it.
> 
> So sometimes, lower admissions are well worth it if it 
> increases attendance and you can still make ends meet.
> 
> Deb

=========================================================
Important Subscriber Information:

The Museum-L FAQ file is located at http://www.finalchapter.com/museum-l-faq/ . You may obtain detailed information about the listserv commands by sending a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "help" (without the quotes).

If you decide to leave Museum-L, please send a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "Signoff Museum-L" (without the quotes).

ATOM RSS1 RSS2