MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Harry Needham (Tel 776-8612)" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 19 Mar 1997 14:54:32 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
I recall seeing a set of standards that had been developed in 1990 or 1991 by
an organization called (I think) The Audit Council for England and Wales on
managing "local authority" museums. It addressed virtually every major area of
museum work.  As well, 42 pages are devoted to standards for conservation in
the "Standard Practices Handbook for Museums" published by the Alberta Museums
Association.

As a former auditor, I can say that having performance standards provides an
excellent (indispensable?) basis for planning and conducting the audit. Audit
guides, published by a number of organizations, simply take performance
standards and decide what particular audit tests and procedures, sample sizes,
etc., will be required to assess compliance with the standards. The problem
comes when you have to audit a funxtion that does NOT have these, such as
museum "management" or where you get into "comprehensive" (value for money)
auditing.

Harry Needham
Canadian War Museum

ATOM RSS1 RSS2