MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Wendy Jessup <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 30 Apr 1997 09:48:07 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (87 lines)
A while back I forwarded a query on flattening paper to Conservation On-Line.
 Here is one response that I have received to date.  Apologies to those who
are cross-posted:


---------------------
Forwarded message:
From:   [log in to unmask] (George Leake)
To:     [log in to unmask]
Date: 97-04-23 16:31:48 EDT

[please realize I am not a professional conservator, simply technical staff
in Preservation work with 12 years experience]

    I recently ran across this description of removing warps from
    paper in the following way on a genealogy newsgroup. Can anyone
    offer a critique of this method?
*indeed. I will critique away (my comments prefaced with *)

 A better method or reference guide?
*it should be obvious here that what's causing the uncurling is the use of
humidity. Clearly there are many better and safer options. A sealed chamber
or area of some size with a humidifier going. Instrumentation should be set
to gauge RH%. IMHO, relative humidity should be gradually increased.
Obviously a more contained environment like a vacuum chamber might be best.
Although even a cigar humidor would be better (again, IMHO) than this! As
far as reference guides go, I know of none offhand


       "I have worked with curled photographs and folded documents
*very important point here. The conservators here at the Ransom Center have
always made this point about paper--it tends to have a memory. One wonders
quite seriously whether folded and curled documents or photographs might
not be apt to curling back up later on even after they're relaxed--paper
has a memory, and dry conditions can cause tightness in many media.


        successfully in the following way: I purchased a very large
        plastic container like you use to store sweaters or a
        blanket. I then put distilled water in the bottom of this
        container. (about 1/2 inch). Take a pie pan or bowl turned
        upside down in the middle of the container.[I like to use
        ones that are small even so that the lid will still close
        but the documents have room not to be touching the cover]
        (this makes a surface where the document can stay but
        doesn't get into the water)  Place the photo on the pan/bowl
        and cover the container. Let it sit anywhere from 12 hours
        to a day or so. (Don't forget it!)
*the problem with this set up is obvious. What keeps the document(s) from
falling in the water, or the water splashing the document?

*one hazard of all uses of humidity to relax paper and other media is of
course the promotion of mold


Once the document has
        absorbed the moisture usually I can unfold it or unroll the
        photo.  You must then immediately place it between wax paper
        or photographic blotting paper and put a very large book on
        top of it.
*the blotting paper sounds good, though what we tend use is more a board.
Which gets changed after at hour intervals, all depending on amount of
moisture. For pressure, we use pressing boards and cloth covered lead
weights.


  Let it dry that way. I wouldn't try this with
        anything that is too crumbly, mostly I've worked with rolled
        photos or folded fairly solid paper documents."
*again, one needs to keep an eye to general conditions in one's
institution. Does the RH% change with the weather, or do you have control
(or can have it) over  environmental conditions?

"Responsibility is what awaits outside the Eden of Creativity." -- N.
Gordimer


George Leake
[log in to unmask]

It is unlawful to use this email address for unsolicited commercial email
per United States Code Title 47 Sec. 227. I assess a US $500 charge for
reviewing & deleting each unsolicited commercial email. Sending unsolicited
commercial email to my email address denotes acceptance of these terms. My
posting messages to UseNet neither grants consent to receiving nor is
intended to solicit commercial email.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2