It must feel delicious to feel secure behind a cloak of anonymity while
ridiculing those who question the ethical standards of a person who spews
accusations at folk without the courage to face the one, one slanders. The
fact is, that the aggrieved party can get access to the e-mail registration
of the anonymous slanderer and consequences can still befall. And final
irony, my own sympathy goes out to a director who has to deal with disloyal
ex-employees and anonymous slanderers.

The list needs to set a policy that prevents anonymous postings. We need to
ensure that a list master either stops them, or exposes the identity of
these truly unethical folk.

Nicholas Burlakoff

-----Original Message-----
From: Museum discussion list [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf
Of Anon Anon
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 12:13 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: ethical violations at Austin museum-reply from the gutless
coward

It's always nice to feel a bit attacked on a Monday morning, don't you
think?

   For your information, the "Anon Anon" name was a quirk of signing up for
this list some time ago. I wasn't sure what junky mail I'd be receiving, so
I left it anonymous in the blanks.
   More to the present issue though, "yes" I prefer to remain anonymous
because I'm afraid of repercussions among my peers. Does that make me a
gutless coward? Sure, please send me to Hell, do not pass go. I work in an
Austin museum though (I'll say that much), and this is a small town in some
ways and if you knew the personalities involved you'd know that some of them
are not above a little professional retribution. That sort of comes out in
the article. I don't know all of the people involved very well, but some.
Sally is a committed professional, and was treated very unfairly. Other
staff at that museum have been fired, and it seems to go from bad to worse
over there. The university has done nothing.
   This situation is very unfortunate, and the article doesn't make it clear
that a director deaccessioning and selling off collections without public or
curatorial input is really quite a serious offence in the museum world. I
thought it was worth sharing with this list. As museum curators, you know
how serious this is.
   No, I can't "go after him" because I'm not willing to risk that and I
sincerely apologize for being flippant in my earlier message. But that
doesn't mean that others shouldn't know what's going on and we can all learn
from this.



>From: Shoshanna Lansberg <[log in to unmask]>
>Reply-To: Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: ethical violations at Austin museum
>Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 07:59:30 -0800
>
>
>I don't know about you.  But anyone who has the determination to post
>something like this on this forum should have the guts to not be anonymous.
>  From my reading of the article, it sounded like certain former employees
>(maybe ANON ANON, himself) were disgruntled for various reasons.  I am not
>saying what is happening at the Texas Memorial Museum is right or wrong,
>just that you should be willing to stand up for your opinions.  Or maybe,
>ANON ANON is afraid of burning his bridges in this tight museum community?
>  Anon Anon <[log in to unmask]> wrote:Does anyone know if ethical
>violations are punishable by law? Someone ought
>to go after this guy.
>
>
>
>
>http://www.austinchronicle.com/issues/dispatch/2003-02-21/pols_feature.html
>
>
>The Texas Memorial Museum turns back toward its future
>
>Only Natural
>
>
>
>
>February 21, 2003:
>
>
>In the belly of the ichthyosaur: Texas Memorial Museum Director Edward C.
>Theriot is at the center of a controversy over the museum's new direction.
>photo by Jana Birchum
>
>The Bob Bullock Texas State History Museum, planted dramatically at the
>north end of the Capitol, was built for people comfortable with the noisy
>bustle of a shopping mall, people who like their history served up
>supersized, consumers who pay top dollar expecting -- and getting --
>spectacle in return. From its gigantic welcoming Lone Star to its
>vertigo-inducing IMAX theatre, it delivers history as theme park: a giant
>display case built to dazzle the crowds of out-of-town tourists.
>
>The old Texas Memorial Museum, opened in 1939 and now tucked away behind
>the
>Performing Arts Center on the north end of the UT campus, was built for
>people with a taste for calmer, less-crowded pleasures. "It was built with
>a
>Victorian ideal of knowledge acquired through quiet," said Museum Director
>Ed Theriot said. "But in recent months, TMM has become a much noisier place
>-- caught in the middle of a fussy yet principled debate over where the old
>museum is headed and a yearlong renovation to help it get there (see "A
>Pterosaur's Eye View," p.26).
>
>TMM is changing -- Theriot is seeing to it -- and there are some people who
>don't like the change. They especially don't like the way Theriot is
>handling it. One employee found the change so "ethically troubling" that
>she
>quit her job as manager of the museum's cultural collections. "I was
>dumbfounded," said Sally Baulch, when Theriot announced to the staff, in
>August 2002, that the museum would be getting rid of the cultural
>collections acquired since it opened in 1936 and shifting its focus
>exclusively to natural history.
>
>More than dumbfounded, Baulch said, she questioned the ethics of the
>decision, because neither the museum's staff nor the community were
>involved
>in it. "I'm a little doubtful about [Theriot] making the decision alone.
>That's what made me uncomfortable," said Baulch, who now works for Texas
>Parks and Wildlife. She said the UT board of regents, which also serves as
>the museum board, was not asked to vote on the decision, even though it
>involves dispersing or possibly "deaccessioning" (i.e., selling off)
>potentially valuable collections. "I think when we are talking about what
>happens to more than 40,000 objects," Baulch said. "It needs to go to the
>regents."
>
>The Wonders of the World The thousands of objects among the TMM cultural
>history holdings include items acquired from donations and field
>collections. They range from the mundane to the exotic, from lowbrow to
>high
>art, from practical to whimsical, from the historic to the merely old.
>There
>are kitschy objects made from animal horn, but there is also an impressive
>collection, of unknown worth, of pre-Columbian pottery; a collection of
>1,300 firearms that includes not only a historic pair of beat-up pistols
>owned by Stephen F. Austin but also a German machine gun of no particular
>historic value; a teapot presented to Sam Houston in 1839 by the empress of
>China in honor of Texas independence; Moroccan rugs; more than 30 Navajo
>rugs from the late 19th and early 20th centuries; quilts, including Texas
>quilts that made up the museum's final cultural exhibition; clothing and
>costumes from antique hats to a 1960s swimsuit; lamps that burn everything
>from fat to kerosene; various military objects; boot-making and shoe-repair
>tools; 340 timepieces of various sorts; 877 U.S. patent models; tools;
>ranching equipment including 840 branding irons, 230 pairs of spurs, 60
>saddles, and 120 barbed-wire samples; various anthropological materials
>from
>the U.S. and Canada; Mexican folk art, textiles, and ceramics; 1,600
>Mexican
>folk toys; and a variety of items from South America, Africa, and Oceania.
>
>Baulch described the holdings as "really broad" with "worldwide" sources.
>She said that when Theriot made the decision to eliminate the cultural
>holdings, he said that "Texana materials would go to the university's
>Center
>for American History. The other stuff was not mentioned" -- another
>troubling aspect of the decision.
>
>Brent Lyles is another former TMM employee. He lost his job as director of
>Public Programs before Theriot announced the changes at the museum, but he
>has been vocal about his discomfort with Theriot's action. "I don't think
>Ed
>is doing anything illegal, but I think he is doing something unethical, and
>I think he knows it."
>
>Theriot doesn't back away from the fact that he made the decision to change
>TMM's direction. And he doesn't find it ethically troubling, either. "I get
>a little hot with this ethical argument," Theriot said. "Unethical would be
>putting things where they will never be seen. We cannot be the museum of
>the
>stuff the staff loves any more than we can be the museum of the stuff Ed
>Theriot thinks is cool. We will fail."
>
>Theriot said his decision had the support of Mary Ann Rankin, dean of the
>College of Natural Sciences, which operates TMM. University Provost Sheldon
>Ekland-Olson submitted the proposed change to the university's legal
>affairs
>office before signing off on it in August 2002. Theriot also defended the
>decision as being perfectly ethical within the museum community. True, TMM
>was first chartered as a natural history and cultural facility in 1935, but
>Theriot said it was made part of the university in 1959, with the
>stipulation that it be run "for the benefit of the University of Texas." He
>contends that his decision to eliminate the cultural collections is the
>best
>way for the museum to serve the university, especially under the wing of
>the
>College of Natural Sciences.
>
>Theriot sees no reason why his decision should have come as a surprise to
>anyone, and says it was no secret: "When I was hired there was a question
>during the [job] interview about changing the focus of the museum to
>natural
>history." That was more than five years ago.
>
>Out of the Attic Ed Theriot seems like the man his credentials and his job
>make him out to be: an academic, a biologist, a museum enthusiast. But he
>is
>also a museum director who has had to take a long, businesslike look at the
>museum he runs -- and the Bullock-influenced world he runs it in -- and
>make
>some businesslike decisions.
>
>"Thinking about it like a business -- not a for-profit business, but not a
>for-loss business, either -- if you try to be all things to all people all
>the time, you fail," Theriot said. "People think of us as the dinosaur
>museum." And he doesn't think that is a bad thing. But he thinks there is
>another way to see TMM, too. "We are a 60-year-old start-up business." And
>he doesn't think that is such a good thing. To be successful, he says, "We
>have to leverage our core resources against what the public wants.
>
>"Even with no Bullock, you could see what we needed to do," Theriot said.
>It
>is "largely a coincidence my decision was made after the Bullock opened."
>
>
>Treasures such as this pterosaur skeleton are what the museum does best,
>Theriot says; to keep everything, he says, would make TMM "the university's
>attic."
>photo by Jana Birchum
>
>"From early on we said we needed to find what would unify and drive the
>museum," he said, adding that that turned out to be natural history. "What
>appealed to people was that we were the authority, making discoveries and
>doing research."
>
>During the past three or four years, Theriot said he has assembled an
>advisory council, drawing heavily on people involved with business and
>marketing. "They suggested change," he said. And they suggested that the
>museum focus on its strength.
>
>One problem is limited resources. TMM operates on an annual budget of about
>$1 million, and only $167,000 is provided directly by a state budget line
>item for public programming. Permanent university funds and specific grants
>provide the bulk of the budget, supplemented a bit by sales from the museum
>shop. Indirect costs, including such things as utilities, are paid out of
>general UT revenues and just about double the basic budget -- so the actual
>cost of housing and preserving the collections comes to nearly $2 million.
>Theriot said that the museum has poured a sizeable portion of its resources
>into cultural history exhibits in recent years, at the expense of the bulk
>of the museum's holdings. "While doing a very nice job with things like
>quilts and with rearranging Native American artifacts, at the end of the
>day
>we still were stuck with a 1960s geology hall," he said. He believes that
>approach was doing the university and the museum a disservice.
>
>Theriot said the strength of TMM's core resources is clearly in the natural
>history collections, where between 5 and 6 million individual pieces make
>up
>99.3% of the museum's holdings. "That other 0.7% represents the cultural
>history holdings and approximately 50% of that is what we would call
>'Texana'" -- items directly related to Texas history. In addition, Theriot
>said, the natural history collection, which has built up through years of
>university-generated research and study, "grew organically"; the cultural
>history collection "grew more randomly," sometimes through study, often
>through donations. Thus, "the sum of it is more random than the natural
>history collection."
>
>Theriot cited the 1,300-piece firearms collection. "We had it inspected by
>a
>professional about three years ago. He said what we had was a nice
>assemblage, but not really a collection." Theriot described other parts of
>the cultural history collection as "piecemeal" and "fragmented"
>accumulations and said, "We are not the university's attic."
>
>However, the university's Center for American History "sees itself as being
>the university's attic," Theriot said. So, when he made the decision to
>eliminate the cultural history function of the museum, it was the first
>place he contacted. He knew they would want the Texana material.
>
>Getting and Spending Don Carleton directs the Center for American History.
>"This is something that should have happened years ago," he said. "It is a
>way of putting strength with strength. They [TMM] haven't been able to work
>with the material. We will be able to work with it more. It goes to the
>heart of taking resources and managing them." Carleton said his staff
>already has begun examining the materials, seeing just what is Texana and
>what is not. It is a process that will take as long as a year.
>
>Theriot said the history center will not be allowed simply to "cherry pick"
>the Texana collection and skim the good stuff. "They know they have to take
>it all or nothing." He said the time for dealing with the rest of the
>cultural history collections will be after decisions have been made about
>the Texana. But the fate of the remainder of the collections could be
>something entirely different: deaccession. That is what a museum does when
>it gets rid of holdings. And that is what seems to be on the minds of some
>of the people critical of Theriot.
>
>"What I would like to see happen is for the university and the public to
>see
>what a treasure they have and hire a manager to show it off," said former
>staffer Brent Lyles. But that is not a part of Theriot's plans.
>
>Lyles doesn't think much of Theriot's abilities as a museum director. "He
>is
>well-intentioned, but I don't think he is an effective manager," Lyles
>said.
>He also thinks Theriot has shirked ethical responsibility by not including
>more people in the decision to change the focus of TMM and get rid of the
>cultural history collections.
>
>Bausch has similar criticisms. "Usually decision is staff-driven. This is
>one person making the decision," she said. "The advisory council is not
>allowed to shape the direction of the museum." Bausch described Theriot's
>advisory council as nothing more than a "friends of the museum" group. She
>still sees the museum as hampered by a lack of planning. But she also
>admitted that if the staff instead of Theriot had made the decision on
>which
>way TMM should go -- nature or culture -- the decision probably would have
>been the same. "We would have made the decision a different way," Bausch
>said. "And we would have made an easier transition."
>
>While the Texana materials will be changing homes, all of it will remain
>property of the university. But what about the other collections? The
>pre-Columbian pottery? The Navajo blankets? The Moroccan rugs? All those
>firearms, costumes, and hats, the Eskimo jacket, the African spears? Is
>there a chance that any of that material actually will be sold?
>
>
>photo by Jana Birchum
>
>"Yes," Theriot said. Attempts will be made to place some of the collections
>with other museums in the state. But could any of the museum's cultural
>collections reach the open market? "In theory, yes," Theriot said, though
>he
>added that it is far too early in the process to consider it. "But we would
>have to consider donors' wishes, the educational value of certain items,
>what other museums are interested in buying and selling. And if we do sell
>anything, we can't just pocket the money or use it to cover shortfalls or
>capital investments. We could use it to buy other collections or in
>something like a research endowment."
>
>But he said that until decisions are made on the Texana, no other decisions
>will be made as to what to do with other parts of the collection. He said
>that is why he could not tell staffers precisely what will happen to all of
>the collections when he announced last August that the museum would focus
>on
>natural history. He said he still does not know. "The Texana is easy."
>
>Thinking of Dinosaurs The curtain officially came down on TMM's involvement
>with cultural history on Dec. 31, 2002. The final show featured Texas
>quilts
>and Native American cultures in the museum's fourth-floor gallery. Now that
>gallery and a large first-floor gallery are closed for renovation. A
>dinosaur skeleton hangs from the ceiling of the first-floor gallery,
>ghost-wrapped snugly in plastic as workers paint the walls. The galleries
>are not scheduled to reopen until next year, but by early January, only
>items pertaining to natural history were for sale in the museum gift shop.
>
>The first-floor gallery will house a brand new Hall of Geology and will be
>home to dinosaurs, fossil animals, rocks, and minerals, along with a
>working
>paleontologist. The fourth floor will feature the latest in
>computer-assisted visualization technology.
>
>Theriot said his advisory council told him "to make the museum more
>presentable," and that is what is happening. Specimens will be "artfully
>displayed" in freshly renovated spaces. But the spirit of the old TMM will
>live on. "We are going for an old look, but without the stodginess,"
>Theriot
>said.
>
>Lynn Denton is director of the Bullock State History Museum. She worked for
>TMM for more than a decade and served as manager of the cultural history
>collections. "They have some tough decisions to make" to remain vital, she
>said. "These are important collections, and I have no indication that they
>don't see them as important collections." Of the museum's decision to rid
>itself of the cultural history collections, Denton said that "as long as
>this is handled thoughtfully, carefully and legally, I don't see a problem.
>This is a path TMM has been shaping for a long time, but that hasn't always
>been articulated clearly along the way."
>
>Some people see Ed Theriot as a no-way-but-my-way kind of guy, with a
>no-nonsense management style, but he is also undeniably a man with a vision
>and a mission for his little museum. Leaving others to debate ethics and
>committees, Theriot is striding toward the future across what he obviously
>sees as firm legal and ethical ground. He said he is working with his
>advisory council to "brand" the museum, in time for a full reopening in
>January of 2004. When Texans think of dinosaurs, fish, snakes, rocks, and
>fossils, Theriot wants them to think of the Texas Memorial Museum. In the
>increasingly competitive and sometimes flashy world of museums, he doesn't
>want to be Brand X.
>
>
>
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*
>http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
>
>=========================================================
>Important Subscriber Information:
>
>The Museum-L FAQ file is located at
>http://www.finalchapter.com/museum-l-faq/ . You may obtain detailed
>information about the listserv commands by sending a one line e-mail
>message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should
>read "help" (without the quotes).
>
>If you decide to leave Museum-L, please send a one line e-mail message to
>[log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "Signoff
>Museum-L" (without the quotes).
>
>
>---------------------------------
>Do you Yahoo!?
>Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, and more
>
>=========================================================
>Important Subscriber Information:
>
>The Museum-L FAQ file is located at
>http://www.finalchapter.com/museum-l-faq/ . You may obtain detailed
>information about the listserv commands by sending a one line e-mail
>message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should
>read "help" (without the quotes).
>
>If you decide to leave Museum-L, please send a one line e-mail message to
>[log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "Signoff
>Museum-L" (without the quotes).


_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

=========================================================
Important Subscriber Information:

The Museum-L FAQ file is located at
http://www.finalchapter.com/museum-l-faq/ . You may obtain detailed
information about the listserv commands by sending a one line e-mail message
to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "help"
(without the quotes).

If you decide to leave Museum-L, please send a one line e-mail message to
[log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "Signoff
Museum-L" (without the quotes).

=========================================================
Important Subscriber Information:

The Museum-L FAQ file is located at http://www.finalchapter.com/museum-l-faq/ . You may obtain detailed information about the listserv commands by sending a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "help" (without the quotes).

If you decide to leave Museum-L, please send a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "Signoff Museum-L" (without the quotes).