MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Ross Weeks <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 13 Aug 1998 13:41:44 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
Starlyn, the best and most effective argument you can use is to make sure
your governing board has this stipulation in its collections policy -- and
your job is simply to adhere to the policy of the institution.

If your board doesn't, or won't, then there isn't much point in arguing, is
there?
-----Original Message-----
From: Starlyn D'Angelo <[log in to unmask]>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.museum-l
To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Thursday, August 13, 1998 12:46 PM
Subject: Donor agreements


>What are your strongest arguments for upholding the "no strings attached"
>policy for donations to museum collections?
>I am a young professional and occassionally I find that I must back up my
>opinions with hard facts or the words of others before people listen
>to me.  I insist that no professional museum promises donors permanent
>display of an object (this is noted several times in the
>Museum-L archives but no rationale is provided).  I need the words of other
>professionals to back me up.  Thanks for your help.
>
>Starlyn D'Angelo, Curator
>Old Stone Fort Museum Complex

ATOM RSS1 RSS2