MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Arlyn Danielson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 9 Mar 1998 16:20:22 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (37 lines)
David:
I'm with you all the way.  I can certainly see where you are also talking
about those tacky, trashy t-shirt and gimmick sales booths on the
Smithsonian Mall.  The Park Service did us all a favor by banning them and
thereby clearing our view of historical Washington landmarks.
Arlyn Danielson

----------
From:   David Haberstich[SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
Sent:   Monday, March 09, 1998 3:59 PM
To:     [log in to unmask]
Subject:        Re: 12th day MET protest

 I share Tom Heard's concerns and confusion. If police are truly
battering artists and protesters, that's outrageous and despicable, but
I'm bothered by the propagandistic tone of these messages about street
art sales. It's easy to muddle separate legal issues, and there are
several here that need to be distinguished. I don't think it's
reasonable to conflate the right to sell a product--whether it's a
T-shirt, painting, or kitchen utensil--with the right to free speech.
The sale of T-shirts without a license is often claimed as a free-speech
issue simply because these products bear a printed message, but I think
this is specious. If a government has a right to regulate permanent
businesses such as art galleries in fixed locations, it has a right to
regulate and/or license mobile or open-air sales as well. I don't think
requiring someone to pass through some legal and bureaucratic hoops and
pay some fees in order to conduct business is a restriction on "free
speech" at all. Is it fair to place zoning restrictions, sales tax
procedures, and licensing fees on fixed-location businesses, but not
minimal-overhead street vendors? What's being sold is beside the point.
It's an issue of commerce, not free speech. I believe in free speech and
oppose censorship, and expression through art should be recognized as a
protected form of speech. But such rights do not guarantee that you can
sell your messages and derive income from them any way you see fit. I
think communities have a fundamental right to regulate the commerce
within them in a fair and equitable way. --David Haberstich

ATOM RSS1 RSS2