MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Robin Panza <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 12 Jun 1996 11:43:27 -5
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
In article <[log in to unmask]>,
Mike Petit <[log in to unmask]> writes:
> In the preparation of materials to promote the exhibition, a spirited
> debate ensued as to the use of the short-hand word "Dino" for ad and
> brochure copy.
>
> Some believe that it is not in public use but lingo of a small and
> insignificant rabble in the museum trade.  Others think it a warm and
> cuddly way of introducing nightmare creatures to tiny tots.  Our

I'm not saying I advocate the use of "dino" by a museum, but I think your
debaters have the situation backwards.  With products like Dinobites canned
pasta, how can anyone think the term is museum jargon?  Watch an hour of kid
TV, and I'll bet you see at least 1 ad for "dino" something-or-other.

Robin Panza                     [log in to unmask]
Section of Birds, Carnegie Museum of Natural History

ATOM RSS1 RSS2