MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bruce Kato - Patricia Owen <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 10 Jun 1996 22:59:55 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
I am interested in developing a formal process for administrative review of
exhibitions or objects on temporary exhibit that a patron may find
objectionable.  I am unaware of any examples that currently exist within the
museum community.

The closest policy that I have found is the review or request for
reconsideration process used by most public libraries when a book is being
challenged by a patron.  If a material is questioned, the patron is asked to
fill out a Library Material Form, which is reviewed by the Library Board.
The Board acts as the review committee.  If the Board's decision does not
satisfy the patron, an appeal may be made to the City Council.

If any of your institutions have developed similar procedures, I would
appreciate receiving examples.

Thank You.

Bruce Kato, Chief Curator
Alaska State Museums
395 Whittier Street
Juneau, Alaska  99801
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2