MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"David E. Haberstich" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 5 Sep 2000 01:57:41 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (48 lines)
I'm not convinced that there is an "unconquerable rift" between academics and
museum people.  If there is, I'd like to see more evidence than the merely
anecdotal.  Are there any attitude surveys or statistical evidence that there
is a pervasive prejudice by academics against museum careers?  As
disconcerting as it may be to hear "some" professors make disparaging remarks
against museums or museum staff, and as unpleasant as it may be to hear such
remarks directed against one's own career choices, is there any solid
evidence that this constitutes a real problem?  On one hand, it is probably
true that many promising historians will have better opportunities to make
their mark in research within an academic setting than at the lower rungs of
a museum career.  It seems to me that a traditional professorial career
simply has more research time built into it than the average traditional
museum job.  What might be construed as a prejudice against museum work may
actually be a simple recognition of the reality that a typical academic
usually has more time for research and scholarship than a museum employee.  A
professor with a bright, talented student may well feel, rightly or wrongly,
that museums offer limited opportunity for the promising scholar to develop.
(I realize, incidentally, that jobs in academia and museums are both hard to
find at the present time.)

I know a psychiatrist who relates that her medical school professors were
upset that she chose to enter the field of psychiatry, apparently because
they felt that she had skills as a surgeon which would be squandered in the
mental health field.  She suspected that they had a prejudice against
psychiatry, but perhaps they simply hated to lose a good surgeon.

On the other hand, it would not surprise me if there are academics who do not
approve of recent trends in museums, with their emphasis on entertainment and
what sometimes looks like "dumbing down" to appeal to broader audiences, and
would prefer that their best students remain in what they consider the higher
strata of education.  They may be suspicious that the apparent glamour of
museum work lures scholars into a less serious enterprise, which sometimes
looks like show business.  This is merely hypothesis on my part, since I
haven't yet encountered any anti-museum academics myself.  If I run into one,
I'll demand an explanation!

Seriously--anyone who is troubled by this phenomeon should request a cogent
explanation and report back to this list.

David Haberstich

=========================================================
Important Subscriber Information:

The Museum-L FAQ file is located at http://www.finalchapter.com/museum-l-faq/ . You may obtain detailed information about the listserv commands by sending a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "help" (without the quotes).

If you decide to leave Museum-L, please send a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "Signoff Museum-L" (without the quotes).

ATOM RSS1 RSS2