I agree with you regarding the personal nature of these items.  The
majority of hair jewelry, wreaths, etc. were associated with the death
of a loved one and (in my opinion) should be treated with the respect
due any funerary artifact.  Whether or not the hair wreath is funeral or
death related, this is an historical artifact that was donated or
purchased for it's historical value....if donated, I'm sure the donor
thought that by placing it in a museum it would receive proper
care/treatment.  Isn't that what museums are suppose to do....preserve
and protect history for future generations?   The only possible disposal
of this item should be to transfer ownership to another museum that has
need of this form of artifact.  If you cannot locate a museum in Indiana
that has need of this....we would be happy to have it in our collection!

Sharon
Belle Meade Plantation
Nashville, TN

Jeremy T. Chrabascz wrote:

>We are currently in a position to deaccession a couple of hair wreaths from
>the permanent collection.  Our preferred method of disposition would always
>be to transfer them to another cultural institution in need (by statute,
>another institution in Indiana).  However, our Collection Review Committee
>also discussed, should we be unable to transfer or exchange them, other
>possible means of disposition.
>
>As of now, the State requires the use of a state sale and the state surplus
>system.  For this particular type of material, as Curator I am not
>comfortable selling it.  I WOULD LIKE TO GET OTHER PEOPLE'S THOUGHTS ON
>THIS ETHICAL DILEMMA.
>
>To me, many hair wreaths are of a very personal nature akin to Native
>funerary objects (associated or unassociated).  Just because they were
>produced by non-Native peoples should not make them any less culturally
>sensitive, in my view.  Not all hair work was produced for mourning but
>many of them were.  Objects of such a personal nature, in my view, should
>not be sold or treated as a commodity...at least not by a museum
>(unfortunately, there are many of them popping up on eBay these days).
>
>Would anyone else be opposed to the sale of such items?  Should we be?
>
>Another possible method of disposition would be physical destruction or
>destructive analysis.  That is, it was recommended that Conservation might
>have use for the items for examination/instruction.
>
>Return to the donor, in this case, is not possible.
>
>Thank you for your time and consideration.
>
>Jeremy T. Chrabascz, Curator of Furnishings
>Indiana State Museum & Historic Sites
>
>=========================================================
>Important Subscriber Information:
>
>The Museum-L FAQ file is located at http://www.finalchapter.com/museum-l-faq/ . You may obtain detailed information about the listserv commands by sending a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "help" (without the quotes).
>
>If you decide to leave Museum-L, please send a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "Signoff Museum-L" (without the quotes).
>
>
>

=========================================================
Important Subscriber Information:

The Museum-L FAQ file is located at http://www.finalchapter.com/museum-l-faq/ . You may obtain detailed information about the listserv commands by sending a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "help" (without the quotes).

If you decide to leave Museum-L, please send a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "Signoff Museum-L" (without the quotes).