MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Peggy Cole <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 12 Jul 1995 09:21:43 +1000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
On Tue, 11 Jul 1995, David Haberstich wrote:

> I'd like to add a MAJOR dissent to Cathy Brady's minor dissent about the use o
f
>  the word "center."  Take it from someone who works in a "center": you do end
u
> p spending a lot of time explaining what your organization does because "cente
r
> " is such an ambiguous, meaningless, essentially STUPID buzzword.  It's becomi
n
> g one of the most overworked words in the English language.  My advice is to r
e
> sist this asinine fad of naming everything from a closetful of A-V equipment a
> "media center" to a whole county office building a "multifunctional center" (I
> have such an absurdity in my county). I think it's an exercise in obscurantism
> to call everything a center, and I can't see pandering to people who think the
y
>  hate museums by sneakily calling it a "center" instead; sooner or later peopl
e
>  will catch on and will deliberately stay ON THE EDGE, avoiding all centers!
> Let's stop cheapening the language this way.  If you're a museum, say so proud
l
> y: to call yourself a "history center" is an exercise in non-communication.  O
f
>  course, if you're trying to expand and do more than traditional museum functi
o
> ns so that you think the word "museum" is inadequate to describe what you do,
m
> aybe it's a signal that you're becoming unfocussed and losing sight of your mi
s
> sion!    --David Haberstich
Well said>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2