MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Tim Vitale <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 5 Jul 2006 14:08:04 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (60 lines)
Newspaper from 1800-1861 should be on good quality paper that should not 
be showing much sign of deterioration.  If they are local, they could 
have considerable historic value, based on there availability  in your 
region.   150-200 year old material is usually considered historic.  
There has been consider ink spilt on the policy of  "microfilm or scan 
and toss" for newspapers.  This tends to make what remains even more 
valuable.

During the Civil War paper began to be made from lower quality 
materials.  By the turn of the century (much earlier in many locations) 
groundwood became the common paper type for newspapers.  The groundwood 
newsprint is the material that is yellowing markedly and crumbling.  It 
will only get worse, so doing something now is desirable. 

"Cutting up" is not a Conservation decision, so this will need to be a 
curatorial decision.  Check with local institutions to see if they have 
collected and are storing the materials already.

The advantage of selecting and "cutting up" the article, that the 
organization "wants," is that the first level of collecting has been 
done.  A decision was made that something is saved.  This is superior to 
throwing it all out, or letting it go even more, and then throwing it 
all out because it is unusable.  The problem is that some material will 
be rejected, which could be important in the eyes of a specialist.  The 
other problem is that something could be on the back of the area 
selected for harvesting. 

Some groups are photocopying on to good quality archival paper, but the 
resolution is quite low about 150 ppi and very high contrast.  It works, 
and copied do not need cold storage. 

The ideal would be to scan the material to be collected at 600 ppi (300 
ppi, if one must) using a tabloid sized scanner, such as the Epson 
10000XL, or the older 1640XL, and then hold the newsprint as long as you 
can in compact cold (frozen) storage.  I don't know the current Microtek 
equipment, but past evaluations have steered  me clear from even 
considering Microtek when making evaluations for clients.  Scanning 
newsprint may be "just" the right application for a Microtek.

Tim Vitale
Paper, Photographs &
Electronic Media Conservator
Film Migration to Digital Format
Digital Imaging & Facsimiles
Preservation & Imaging Consulting
Preservation Associates
1500 Park Avenue
Suite 132
Emeryville, CA 94608

510-594-8277
510-594-8799 fax

=========================================================
Important Subscriber Information:

The Museum-L FAQ file is located at http://www.finalchapter.com/museum-l-faq/ . You may obtain detailed information about the listserv commands by sending a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "help" (without the quotes).

If you decide to leave Museum-L, please send a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "Signoff Museum-L" (without the quotes).

ATOM RSS1 RSS2