MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mark Erik Nielsen <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 30 Oct 1996 08:56:50 -0500
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (32 lines)
Yes, that was my original intention in pointing out this error of
consideration as well as judgment. But it turns out the sexist message was
written by a shyster anyway. Still, another opportunity to publicly
denounce a gravely mistaken additude.

**************************************************************************
Mark Nielsen
Exhibit Designer/Preparator
University of Michigan Museum of Art
[log in to unmask]      313/647-2068

On Wed, 30 Oct 1996, Larisa Overmier wrote:

> To Richard Perry and Henry Grunder:
> In response to your "witty" thoughts on this topic
>
> >>And yes, I know, this is all light and in good fun, not a >>serious
> disagreement . . .
>
> As a woman, this is a serious issue to me because it represents the subtle
> effect of sexism and the old boy's network in museums. I have frequently
> received letters addressed Gentlemen and am always offended by this.
> Addressing letters as such assumes that women do not hold important positions
> within museums and devalues their important role in the field. I was taught
> to always address letters to: Ladies and Gentlemen or To Whom It May Concern.
> I think these are appropriate, avoid making any kinds of assumptions, and are
> effective in getting the point across.
>
> Sincerely,
> Larisa Overmier
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2