Does this mean that the American Association of Archivists (I think that's
their organization) has finally recognized CD-ROM whether it be WORM or
otherise, as being "archival?"

At 11:26 AM 4/23/96 -0600, you wrote:
>
>Why are we still using an antiquated technology that creates more
>problems than it solves.  Microfilm is an optometrist's dream- it is a
>conspiracy to make people go blind.
>
>Is there some reason that digital archival storage is not part of this
>workshop?  Not only do you get the material archived, it is not prone to
>loss or scratching like microfilm, and it is readily searchable.
>