MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Eric Siegel <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 26 Sep 1994 15:08:40 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
          RE: Scholarly work on humor in the fine arts.
 
          Andrew Cockburn, the famously funny Stalinist (how's that
          for an oxymoronic epithet) journalist, wrote an introduction
          for a series of PG Wodehouse Jeeves novels. In it, he refers
          to a analytical definition of a laugh as "a tightening of
          the nasal and labial muscles." And throughout the rest of
          the essay he calls analysis of Wodehouse's humour
          "naso-labial-ism."
 
          I myself find it kind of funny that you are working on what
          sounds to be a quite sober analysis of why humour is missing
          in the fine arts. Maybe a case of naso-labialism? Actually,
          I would be interested to hear in more detail what your
          program will be like.
 
          Eric Siegel
          [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2