> For your immediate issue, can you interview the named names, and discuss 
> what their objections to incorporation were? Perhaps there's a way to 
> present the pros and cons instead of presenting opponents as the villains 
> and the others as the successful victors?
> Good luck!
> Manon

Unfortunately, I have not been able to get a single opponent (except for one 
who was not really an opponent in philosophy, but only one at the time 
because of the position he held) to agree to an interview, or even to get 
contact information for them.

I would like to present a balanced view, but I'm not getting one to work 
with (99% of the written material I have access to is from the pro camp as 
well).  I am doing my best to read between the lines, however.

I did not choose the subject matter, or I suspect I would be going about 
this in an entirely different manner.

But my main question was more -- how do I present a balanced (or as balanced 
as I can manage, given the circumstances) viewpoint on what is still 
obviously a rather divisive issue without losing support for the Society 
from either side?  Or is that a pipe dream?

Meg Justus 

=========================================================
Important Subscriber Information:

The Museum-L FAQ file is located at http://www.finalchapter.com/museum-l-faq/ . You may obtain detailed information about the listserv commands by sending a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "help" (without the quotes).

If you decide to leave Museum-L, please send a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "Signoff Museum-L" (without the quotes).