MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mandy Murphy <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 31 Jan 1995 08:06:15 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
Lisa Roberts wrote: In other words, if history is all revisionist, as
          one poster wrote, and is always being rewritten according to
          the view from the present, then let's TELL THAT TO THE
          VISITOR!  That's what's going on here.  Instead of just
          presenting an interpretation, we need to be upfront about
          the basis--the context, if you will--for that
          interpretation.
 
Thank you Lisa for stating my point.  Every exhibit presents a
          point-of-view, whether implicitly or explicitly.  Museums
          need to tell the public what an exhibit's (or
          the exhibit's creators) point-of-view is based on.  The
          public may not agree, that's ok, but at least they should
          understand the exhibit is not supposed to display the one
          ultimate truth.
 
          Mandy Murphy (personal views only, not representative of
          NPS)
          [log in to unmask] National Park Service
          Archeological Assistance Division
          Washington DC

ATOM RSS1 RSS2