MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mark Erik Nielsen <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 17 Jan 1996 09:02:08 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
Dude.....You totally SAID it!

On Tue, 16 Jan 1996, Paul Apodaca wrote:

> I agree that AAM needs to address these issues. They are conspicuous in
> their silence so far in this long discussion. Two years ago at the
> California Association of Museums meeting in San Diego there was an
> attempt to discuss the value of employees and the importance of their
> roles and value to the museum.  There was little enthusiasm for the topic
> at that time. I do think that the organizations that represent themselves
> as leaders and set standards should be concerned about the standards
> necessary for employees to be treated well by this profession.
> Accreditation should also mean that there is fair treatment of employees.
> Museums often are speaking with the split tongue when they allude to
> the maintenance of standards and professionality and then foster an
> atmosphere that does not hold directors and boards accountable for the
> fair treatment of employees who are generally highly qualified and dedicated.
>
> Paul Apodaca
> [log in to unmask]
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2