MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Audra Oliver <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 3 Sep 2003 12:30:19 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
>>> [log in to unmask] 08/27/03 09:22AM >>>
writes:

"While I don't know anything about Canadian law (which, I assume, would
apply in Quebec) I find it very difficult to believe that a newspaper
would need a signed release from a person addressing a political rally
that was open to the public before it could publish a photograph
depicting that luminary speaking. In addition, I would find it very
strange if the law requires that the newspaper obtain a signed release
before publishing a photograph showing identifiable attendees at a public
political rally."

From what I remember David is right.  You only need a release if there are under X number of people in the photograph or at the event.  Regrettably, I do not recall what value X represents!

=========================================================
Important Subscriber Information:

The Museum-L FAQ file is located at http://www.finalchapter.com/museum-l-faq/ . You may obtain detailed information about the listserv commands by sending a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "help" (without the quotes).

If you decide to leave Museum-L, please send a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "Signoff Museum-L" (without the quotes).

ATOM RSS1 RSS2