MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 8 Jun 1998 19:49:07 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (38 lines)
>Date: Sun, 7 Jun 1998 13:35:10 -0500
>Sender: [log in to unmask]
>Precedence: bulk
>From: [log in to unmask] (David Green)
>To: Multiple recipients of list <[log in to unmask]>
>Subject: Fair Use Seriously Endangered
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>X-To: [log in to unmask]
>X-Sender: [log in to unmask]
>
>NINCH ANNOUNCEMENT
>June 7, 1998
>
>
>The spate of copyright legislation appears to be reaching a climax with two
>bills that contain language that asserts the absolute right of owners of
>copyright to protect digital works electronically with no fair use defense
>for circumventing those protections for what have been up until now legal
>purposes.
>
>The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (S 2037) and the WIPO Copyright
>Implementation Act both contain this absolute anti-circumvention language
>and also do not mention fair use at any point. S2037 was passed last week
>in the Senate and a Commerce Department hearing took place June 5 on HR
>2281.
>
>Many organizations in the educational, scholarly and cultural community are
>calling on members and constituents to contact members of the Commerce
>Committee to explain why this language and these two bills would be
>harmful.
>
>I am following this brief announcement with a detailed memo from the
>National Humanities Alliance that fully explains this situation.
>
>
>David Green
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2