MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Nicholas Carl Visscher <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 5 Aug 2005 15:44:07 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (34 lines)
Is anyone aware of any studies that assess the effectiveness of 
interpretation and using (specifically Tilden's) interpretive principles 
versus other delivery methods (i.e. reading from script) in education 
presentations? 

background:  I was recently at a zoo where I watched an animal training 
demo...there was a live interpreter, but she was reading directly from a 
script.  Straight factual information.  This made me wonder about the way we 
interpret exhibits and animal interactions.   Maybe reading from a script IS 
just as good as putting a lot of effort into making a presentation more 
engaging and interactive?.... 

any thoughts?....any empirical data?... 

Thanks,
Nick Visscher
virtual outreach specialist
Virtual Outreach Program
MSU Museum (room 205)
West Circle Drive
East Lansing, MI  48824
email: [log in to unmask]
phone: 517-353-3882
cell: 517-980-6244
fax: 517-432-2846
http://www.virtualoutreach.org 

=========================================================
Important Subscriber Information:

The Museum-L FAQ file is located at http://www.finalchapter.com/museum-l-faq/ . You may obtain detailed information about the listserv commands by sending a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "help" (without the quotes).

If you decide to leave Museum-L, please send a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "Signoff Museum-L" (without the quotes).

ATOM RSS1 RSS2