MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Brian D. Joyner" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 27 Jul 2005 15:31:42 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (88 lines)
Not to belabor the point but consider the State of Mississippi's (the
second state to secede) own words as to reasons for secession,
http://mshistory.k12.ms.us/features/feature16/letter_01.html.  States right
ultimately addressed its ability to succeed economically, which for a state
like Mississippi nearly 60% black, meant slavery.

Brian D. Joyner
National Register of Historic Places/National Historic Landmarks
202.354.2276


                                                                                                                                         
                      Kyle McQuilkin                                                                                                     
                      <[log in to unmask]        To:       [log in to unmask]                                                  
                      >                          cc:       (bcc: Brian Joyner/WASO/NPS)                                                  
                      Sent by: Museum            Subject:  Re: Gettysburg and the Sons of Confederate Veterans                           
                      discussion list                                                                                                    
                      <[log in to unmask]                                                                                                
                      .LSOFT.COM>                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                         
                      07/27/2005 02:14 PM                                                                                                
                      EDT                                                                                                                
                      Please respond to                                                                                                  
                      Museum discussion                                                                                                  
                      list                                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                         




I found Carol Ely's message to be very well said, and I agree
whole-heartedly.  But I can't help but add my two cents with the desire to
turn the discussion toward museological issues.

As pointed out by several authors, it is difficult for the 21st Century
paradigm to digest the level of state allegience proclaimed by 19th Century
soldiers, particularly in the South.  The fact that we now self-identify as
Americans first, and Texans or New Yorkers second, is largely a result of
the Civil War.  Gettysburg stands in sobering testimony to that reality,
for both sides.  It is hallowed ground.

I am not defending either position.  Rather, to suggest, as has been
pointed out, that the Civil War was an American trajedy, not just a
division between the North and the South.  As such, it seems somewhat
unfair to choose sides at a national battlefield.  For me, the biggest
issue here comes to one of chosen venue for the exhibition.

I recognize the value in on-site exhibits, such as Wounded Knee and
Auschwitz, among many.  And I won't comment on the artistic value of the
work in question, although certainly it deserved an audience.  Just look at
all of the dialogue it has inspired here.  But I think a more sensitive
institution would have moved the exhibit down the street a ways.  Maybe
nobody would have fussed much then.

Is there value in fuss?  Sure.  But there's also value in respect and
dignity.

Perhaps, I gibber.

Cheers,
Kyle McQuilkin
Texas Tech University
School of Art


========================================================= Important
Subscriber Information:


The Museum-L FAQ file is located at
http://www.finalchapter.com/museum-l-faq/ . You may obtain detailed
information about the listserv commands by sending a one line e-mail
message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should
read "help" (without the quotes).


If you decide to leave Museum-L, please send a one line e-mail message to
[log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "Signoff
Museum-L" (without the quotes).

=========================================================
Important Subscriber Information:

The Museum-L FAQ file is located at http://www.finalchapter.com/museum-l-faq/ . You may obtain detailed information about the listserv commands by sending a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "help" (without the quotes).

If you decide to leave Museum-L, please send a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "Signoff Museum-L" (without the quotes).

ATOM RSS1 RSS2