MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
murph the surf <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 1 Aug 1997 01:11:48 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
Art critic Donald Kuspit has posted his very negative review of Documenta X
in Kassel online:
http://www.artnet.com/magazine/features/kuspit/kuspit7-25-97.html

And Jordan Crandall, an artist participating in Documenta X, has posted a
response:
http://www.documenta.de/lists/blast/0339.html

The term "virtual" is often taken to mean some form of reproduction but it
also means potentiality and I think that is where museums are most likely
to find a use for it. Museums are multidimensional with a great deal of
potential beyond the reproduction of the objects it contains in digital
form. I think Crandall makes this point when he says Kuspit didn't see a
third of the exhibition because he wasn't looking for it, because it was
"virtual".

Catherine David, the director of Documenta X (and a museum professional),
has used the exhibition to start a productive debate about how museums and
other institutions could use digital technology and, even more important,
what impact thinking "digital" rather than "analog" may have globally.

Robbin Murphy
[log in to unmask]
<i> i o l a </i>  http://artnetweb.com/iola/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2