MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Rumm <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 12 Nov 2001 09:10:41 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
As a corollary to some of the recent list discussions about identifying an exhibit design firm, what (if any) are the relative advantages and disadvantages of selecting a independent designer and a separate exhibit fabricator, as opposed to going with a firm that can provide both design and fabrication services in-house?  I've heard differing points of view as to economies of scale or other cost-saving gains that may result from using a turnkey outfit to provide both services rather than contracting with separate firms.  It's also been suggested that independent design firms may be more "creative" or "cutting-edge" than in-house design departments, which may design an exhibit more in terms of their firm's fabricating capability than in terms of a client's needs or preferences.  Should concerns such as these make a difference when choosing exhibit designers and fabricators?


Collegially,

John C. Rumm
Executive Director
Catholic Heritage Center

========================================================Important Subscriber Information:

The Museum-L FAQ file is located at http://www.finalchapter.com/museum-l-faq/ . You may obtain detailed information about the listserv commands by sending a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "help" (without the quotes).

If you decide to leave Museum-L, please send a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "Signoff Museum-L" (without the quotes).

ATOM RSS1 RSS2