MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Opaque Watercolor?
From:
Peter Diemand <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 20 Feb 1997 17:44:36 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines) 
What you Winslow Homer think about such a question?

I am afraid I will have to side with him on this one: a watercolor is a
watercolor.

P. Diemand


At 01:49 PM 2/20/97 GMT, you wrote:
>"How do you feel about calling both tempera and gouache "opaque
>watercolor" ? I've seen this at more and more museums/galleries
>lately. Your feedback will be appreciated.
>Thank you, Deborah Cohen"
>
>It's likely, IMHO, that"opaque watercolor" may be used because it can be
>hard to see the difference between tempera and gouache; "opaque
>watercolor" is, at least, not untrue.
>
>Carol Morgan
>
>
Space Problem ? - High Density Storage is the answer !

ATOM RSS1 RSS2