MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Rebecca Fitzgerald <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 3 Aug 2005 14:54:52 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (50 lines)
>I like to remind people that this controversy is not about evolution or
>even science. It is about telling other people what they should believe,
>and what is right and wrong. 

And this of course is the crux of most of the problems of the world. In
every debate there are those on each side who feel that they're having the
opposite view forced on them. 

By the way, who are "they?" In this case is "they" an organized group
pushing ID, or the millions of people who believe that that God created the
universe and every thing in it, whether in a week, or by initiating that
moment of creation - what some folks call the "big bang." Or is "they" some
other sinister group? 

Science and religion necessarily intersect in this discussion, since both
consider our origin as part of their "turf." So, after many years of
studying this debate, and reading all there is on the subject, I'm forced to
ask:
1. Where's the proof? If science cannot produce the proof, then they're
asking me to take it on faith. Hmmm...that's exactly what religion asks too.
2. If the authority is an evolution theory that's still standing, then I'd
have to say that no one has disproved creationism/ID yet either.
3. If either side says, "Because I'm the "illustrious grand poobah" and I
said so, well then, I'd have to laugh at their arrogance. 

We hold both our scientists and our religious leaders in high esteem. Our
world is much richer for both but they both have had their dark days.
Frankly, we NEED both religion and science in our world today.

What is wrong with teaching both theories? Why not make a place in our
schools for students to be exposed to both? Virtually every adult over the
age of 45 WAS exposed to both theories - and it doesn't seem that those
generations were terribly scarred by the experience. 

Bringing this back to practical museum work - it's so easy to influence
folks through museum exhibits and programming. I'm always humbled by the
vast educational influence that we wield. It is so important that we "get it
right" and avoid bending our exhibits and interpretation to the current
politically correct viewpoint. 

Becky Fitzgerald
Susquehanna Museum

=========================================================
Important Subscriber Information:

The Museum-L FAQ file is located at http://www.finalchapter.com/museum-l-faq/ . You may obtain detailed information about the listserv commands by sending a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "help" (without the quotes).

If you decide to leave Museum-L, please send a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "Signoff Museum-L" (without the quotes).

ATOM RSS1 RSS2