Dear List Members,

I am facing an ethical problem that I would like to consult list members
about.

Our museum collection owns a large number of photographs, taken in 1887.
These photographs and the purpose they were used for illustrate an important
point in California history.

I have wanted to create an exhibit plus publication around this collection
for years. Sadly, I don't see it happen on my curatorial watch, after all,
and am considering to at least write about the topic in my spare time.

Normally, I write publications as staff, with copy right and proceeds going
to the museum. If this project is created outside the museum though, and
especially if I also do the legwork in getting it published, I would expect
to retain the copyright and whatever proceeds there are.

I am worried though that there is a conflict of interest. All research up
until now has been conducted by me as a museum staff member. While any future
private research would in return benefit the museum, as would publishing a
book on a topic within the collection (without cost to the institution), I
still feel that this is a sticky situation.

The museum policy does not cover this case. Obviously, it needs to be
discussed and negotiated with the director. At this time, I would like to
know how other museums/staff members have handled a similar situation? I'd
appreciate your insight.

Sabine Goerke-Shrode
Curator, Vacaville Museum

=========================================================
Important Subscriber Information:

The Museum-L FAQ file is located at http://www.finalchapter.com/museum-l-faq/ . You may obtain detailed information about the listserv commands by sending a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "help" (without the quotes).

If you decide to leave Museum-L, please send a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "Signoff Museum-L" (without the quotes).