MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Eugene Dillenburg <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 24 Apr 2003 01:15:25 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (72 lines)
On Wed, 23 Apr 2003 18:47:35 -0500, Indigo Nights wrote:

>Ok, dish, Gene!  What was Ms. Janice doing in YOUR
>closet?

Why, cataloguing the skeletons, of course!

Seriously, when Janice Klein weighs in on a subject, the matter comes
pretty close to being settled.  She brings the focus back to the audience,
where it should have been all along.



Re: Ugly Ties

Nice!  Another good site is  www.geocities.com/RodeoDrive/4026/



Re: Pish-Posh

No offense taken.  I've enjoyed the jousting!



On Wed, 23 Apr 2003 18:47:35 -0500, David Haynes <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>OK, Eugene, by this definition the majority of university-associated
>facilities that collect, identify, store, and make available to
>researchers natural history specimens--jar after jar of dead turtles, for
>instance--are not museums unless they have some of their stuff in a case
>out in the hall. Am I reading your viewpoint correctly? Best.  [yet
>another] David H.

Yes, that is precisely what I am saying.  What you have described I would
call a research institute.  These are wonderful, vital, and -- dare I say --
 important things.  But unless they serve a public audience through
exhibition, they are not museums.

(A single institution can be both, of course.  The Field Museum, where I
and various of my co-conspirators once worked, had acres of public exhibits
as well as scores of behind-the-scenes researchers.)

I would go a step further.  The exhibit program must be a significant part
of the institution's efforts in order to qualify as a "museum."  What
is "sigificant"?  Well, I suppose that's subjective.  (As opposed to the
rest of this discussion, which has been the absolute model of
objectivity!)  But I would apply a two-pronged test.  The exhibits must A)
be an attraction in and of themselves, and B) be intended for a broad,
public audience.

So an academic department, with display cases that are only seen by
students or others allowed access to the building, is not a museum.  A
public building, such as a library, that has some exhibits filling in the
dead spots is not a museum.  A building, such as an airport, with displays
in the waiting area to occupy people who came for some other purpose is not
a museum.  Now I hasten to add, all of these exhibits can be quite
wonderful.  I do not belittle them in the least.  But they are incidental
to the organizations' true functions.  In order to be a museum, public
exhibits must be your purpose -- or, at least, a major purpose -- for
existing.

-- Eugene Dillenburg
"Pissing People Off Since 1960"

=========================================================
Important Subscriber Information:

The Museum-L FAQ file is located at http://www.finalchapter.com/museum-l-faq/ . You may obtain detailed information about the listserv commands by sending a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "help" (without the quotes).

If you decide to leave Museum-L, please send a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "Signoff Museum-L" (without the quotes).

ATOM RSS1 RSS2