MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Shana Chambers <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 20 Oct 1997 16:04:53 -0700
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (29 lines)
What groups are you talking about? And what might these entitlements might
you be referring to?

Shana Chambers
[log in to unmask]

On Mon, 20 Oct 1997, Eric Siegel wrote:

> Gary Bauer writes, feverishly:
> > It used to be we were united.
>
> When was this?  Who was united?
>
> Was it white and black?
> Was it christian and jew?
> Was it latinos and people of European descent?
> Was it working men and managers?
>
> I agree that the terms diversity, etc, are getting beaten to the ground,
> and that the concept is being used to create group entitlements that might
> disregard larger unities.  But, please, don't hold up the current times
> against an imaginary past where we were all united.  There was a unity of
> perspective presented in the mainstream media, say in the early 60's.  But
> that was principally because there were such a limited range of voices
> represented in the media.
>
> Eric Siegel
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2