MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Harold Needham <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 22 Aug 2000 15:14:25 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (80 lines)
Hi Michele;

Sorry, thirty years of evaluation, including more than 100 studies on
museums and sites, tell me that you are asking the impossible. Boiling it
down to a single generic form, in the situation you describe, will only give
you poor information which will help you make wrong decisions.

I am sending you offlist an abstract of a one-day workshop I gave at ALHFAM
in June on "Evaluating YOUR Live Interpretation Program".

Harry

"Though we cannot out-vote them, we will out-argue them"

               -  Samuel Johnson (1709-1784)

Harry Needham, M.A., CFE, etc.
President
Harry Needham Consulting Services Inc.
Training & consulting services for heritage institutions - and others!
74 Abbeyhill Drive
Kanata, Ontario K2L 1H1
Canada
email: [log in to unmask]
(Voice) +1.613.831-1068
(Fax) +1.613.831-9412
----- Original Message -----
From: Kraetzig, Michele ERM <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2000 10:06 AM
Subject: Interpretive Staff Evaluations


> Good day all!
>
> I am currently working on improving our existing evaluation form.  I work
> with our provincial historic parks and we have a number of sites all of
> which are not the same themes.  I am hoping to come up with a generic form
> that would be suitable for all sites.  A problem I have come across is the
> many differences between a school group program versus a casual visitor
> program.  I am almost at the conclusion that two seperate forms will be
> required to handle these differences.
>
> My question is - is there anyone who would be willing to share their
> existing evaluation standards or procedures?  Similiar and/or past
> experiences with evaluations?  What is the best way to set up a form?  I
> find that a lot of writing distracts the interpreter that I am evaluating
> and also keeps me from "catching" everything that is taking place.  How
> often should evaluations take place.  Does anyone recommend
> self-evaluations, where the interpreter evaluate themselves?
> More than one question I realize!  Any input would be greatly appreciated.
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Michele Kraetzig
> Cultural Programs
> Parks and Special Places
> Regina, SK  Canada
> email: [log in to unmask]
>
> =========================================================
> Important Subscriber Information:
>
> The Museum-L FAQ file is located at
http://www.finalchapter.com/museum-l-faq/ . You may obtain detailed
information about the listserv commands by sending a one line e-mail message
to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "help"
(without the quotes).
>
> If you decide to leave Museum-L, please send a one line e-mail message to
[log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "Signoff
Museum-L" (without the quotes).
>

=========================================================
Important Subscriber Information:

The Museum-L FAQ file is located at http://www.finalchapter.com/museum-l-faq/ . You may obtain detailed information about the listserv commands by sending a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "help" (without the quotes).

If you decide to leave Museum-L, please send a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] . The body of the message should read "Signoff Museum-L" (without the quotes).

ATOM RSS1 RSS2