ICOM-L Archives

International Council of Museums Discussion List

ICOM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Alexandre Matos <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
International Council of Museums Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 8 Oct 2003 12:16:44 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (89 lines)
Hello....

This is the first time that I participate in this discussion!
I'd just like express some toughts:

Humankind tradition are not cultural heritage!? A music and it´s lyrics aren't cultural heritage!? How do we touch them!? Don't you agree that a place that explain to the next generation the causes of the worldwide imigration, or the causes of the holocaust, even without using objects, can be a museum!? Can a concept (like Concept art for instance) have a place that explains is meaning to others, and other cultures!? 

I confess that my traditional understanding of museums as a place that have to collect objects belongs to the past! At the same time i doesn't agree that any place, for any reason, can be called a museum.

Comunication, collecting humam material and imaterial evidence, natural heritage, their conservation and understanding are the main themes for a museum definition.

Best Regards

Alexandre Matos

www.museusportugal.org

-----Original Message-----
From: Perkko Mariliina [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: terça-feira, 7 de Outubro de 2003 19:38
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: VS: Definition of a Museum


Hei
I strongly agree with Milton Bloch's opinion. What is a museum without
collections? Nothing.
Mariliina
(Mariliina Perkko)

-----Alkuperainen viesti-----
Lahettaja: Milton Bloch [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Lahetetty: 7. lokakuuta 2003 18:24
Vastaanottaja: [log in to unmask]
Aihe: Re: Definition of a Museum


Gary,
I like the gerneral approach for its directness and simplicity but
"...and often objects..."???
Isn't this a bit like saying that a vegetable market it a nutritional outlet
that has stalls, awnings and often vegetables.    Museums without objects
are clearly the exception and their status is still a matter to be resolved.
It seems to me that collections of objects are at the very heart of what
makes museum education unique and therefore they deserve a far stonger
position in the definition.
Milton
(Milton Bloch)





>>> [log in to unmask] 10/07/03 10:50AM >>>
Colleagues:

The following is one of the definition that has been suggested. What are
your thoughts  about this idea. Does it adequately describe a "museum," or
is it too broad, too limiting, too inclusive, or too exclusive?


A MUSEUM IS AN EDUCATIONAL ORGANIZATION THAT SERVES THE PUBLIC BY
INTERPRETING SCIENTIFIC, CULTURAL AND/OR NATURAL HERITAGE THROUGH
THE USE OF A PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT AND OFTEN OBJECTS. MUSEUMS THAT
HOLD COLLECTIONS CARE FOR THEM AS A PUBLIC TRUST AND PRESERVE THEM
FOR THE FUTURE.

Gary Edson

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Change ICOM-L subscription options, unsubscribe, and search the
archives at:  http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/icom-l.html

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Change ICOM-L subscription options, unsubscribe, and search the
archives at:  http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/icom-l.html

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Change ICOM-L subscription options, unsubscribe, and search the
archives at:  http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/icom-l.html

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Change ICOM-L subscription options, unsubscribe, and search the
archives at:  http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/icom-l.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2