Sender: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 10 Nov 1999 10:59:39 -0600 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
<Pine.GSO.3.95q.991109173848.17282A-100000@exeter> |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
No, I hadn't heard of this. Reminds me of the development fight in northern
Virginia two years ago. I'll have to remember the phrase "historical
vandalism."
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Museum discussion list [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On
> Behalf Of Boylan P
> Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 1999 11:46 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: is Hastings in danger?
>
>
> On Tue, 9 Nov 1999, Vincent Lyon & Vivianne Holt wrote:
>
> > I heard a 2 line story on National Public Radio this morning
> with sadly few details concerning the site
> > of the 1066 battle of Hastings.
> > They said there is a move to use the land as a refuse dump.
> > I wondered if any of our colleagues in the British Isles could
> confirm or deny that story.
> > Vincent Lyon
>
> > [log in to unmask]
>
> ======================
>
> Vincent:
>
> No, the battlefield site (in so far as it is known) has legal protection
> for its historic importance, nd part of it is in national "guardianship".
>
> However, there is a controversial proposal for landfill nearby, and on
> land which it is argued would have been used for mustering troops and
> cavalry before (and perhaps during) the actual fighting.
>
> This is very much a repeat of the long-running opposition to the building
> of a major new east-west link road close to site the Battle of Nasby - the
> final decisive battle of the English Civil War. All Government experts
> and most other specialists agreed that while the road would clearly change
> the setting it would not cross the reputed site of the battle itself.
> However, many people supported local residents who were objecting to the
> road project in principle, and presented the historical vandalism case as
> part of an overall "package" of objections.
>
> from the interviews with the two sides I heard, Hastings looks like a
> re-run of this.
>
>
> Patrick Boylan
>
> =========================================================
> Important Subscriber Information:
>
> The Museum-L FAQ file is located at
> http://www.finalchapter.com/museum-l-faq/ > museum-l.html. You may
> obtain detailed information about the listserv commands by
> sending a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask]
> The body of the message should read "help" (without the quotes).
>
> If you decide to leave Museum-L, please send a one line e-mail message to
> [log in to unmask] The body of the message should read "Signoff
> Museum-L" (without the quotes).
>
>
=========================================================
Important Subscriber Information:
The Museum-L FAQ file is located at http://www.finalchapter.com/museum-l-faq/ museum-l.html. You may obtain detailed information about the listserv commands by sending a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] The body of the message should read "help" (without the quotes).
If you decide to leave Museum-L, please send a one line e-mail message to
[log in to unmask] The body of the message should read "Signoff
Museum-L" (without the quotes).
|
|
|