MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Boylan P <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 22 Jan 1999 01:02:32 +0000
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (25 lines)
Not sure I understand the question: what's wrong with ".../2000"?

In the UK the current year date has been written in full since the
introduction in about 1907 of what became know as the "Leicester system"
of numbering - i.e. accession numbers in the form: ##/YEAR/EXT
(where ## is the sequence number for accessions in that year, and EXT is
the extension number for parts or items within that accession).

Patrick Boylan

==================================================

On Wed, 20 Jan 1999, Jan McCormick wrote:

> Greetings:
>
>         I was wondering if anyone has figured out what to use for the year
> 2000 when entering accession numbers on a database? Please feel free to
> send any and all ideas. Your help is much appreciated. I will thank you in
> advance... Thank You!
>
> Jan McCormick
> Curator
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2