MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Peter Rebernik <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 20 Jun 1999 16:51:23 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (118 lines)
TQM is also defined for the service sector. It just means that you document
everything, you try to live up to your clients (federal, private, visitors,
politicians) in a perfect way. It grabs the employees totally, to think in a
different way. In a more holisitc way.
Why not? There are a lot of advisers out there, willing to do the job - and
the museums will improve on that.

A museum dealing with TQM shows that it wants to improve. I would never
discourage such a will.

Greetings,

Peter, the optimistic Rebernik

+--------------------------------------------------------------------
 | PHAROS International - Bureau for Cultural Projects
 | Peter Rebernik, Dipl.-Ing.
 | Anton Baumgartner-Str. 44/C2/3/2
 | A - 1230 Wien / AUSTRIA
 | Tel.:  (+43 1) 667 7375
 | Fax:  (+43 1) 667 2984
 | Mobiltel.: (+43 664) 230 2767
 | Email: [log in to unmask] / Web: www.rebernik.at
+--------------------------------------------------------------------
This mail is a natural product.  The slight variations in spelling and
grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in no way are to
be considered flaws or defects.

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: John A. Bing <[log in to unmask]>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.museum-l
An: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
Datum: Sonntag, 20. Juni 1999 16:33
Betreff: Re: TQM


>Jay has raised an interesting subject about adopting TQM to his
>museum.  I am a bit surprised at the notion but then I don't know what
>kind of museum he works for or just what he expects from TQM.  Let me
>ramble with some thoughts.
>
>1.  "Quality" does not mean that a Cadillac is higher quality than a
>Ford, or a Rolex is higher quality than a Timex.  We use the term
>"Grade" to differentiate between items that do the same thing.
>
>2. The best definition I know for Quality is:  "Doing what you say you
>are going to do"    Timex has "quality" by mass producing an
>inexpensive watch that keeps accurate time.   Rolex has quality by
>producing extremely accurate, attractive, and recognizable watches.
>
>3. TQM is generally associated with manufacturing industries and their
>ongoing production of goods.  TQM strives to get everybody in the
>organization to improve each and every operation such that the
>rejection rate in reduced, the efficiency improved and, without
>saying, profits increase.   The whole process takes time.
>
>4. My experience with museums, other than as a visitor, is as a
>Trustee of an art museum.  We do not have a "production line" to
>improve in the TQM concept.  Instead, we have a series of art
>exhibitions that pretty much stand alone, like individual projects.
>The only thing the exhibitions have in common, besides the walls of
>the museum, are the general steps of selection, fundraising, curating,
>preparing, advertizing and hanging; each one of which is tailor made
>for the individual exhibit.
>
>5.  Project Management  is my field and it, like the museum consists
>of producing individual  activities or projects, (in my case design
>and build chemical plants).  TQM in its purest sense, does not apply,
>however, that does not mean one cannot improve quality in doing one of
>a kind projects.
>
>4.  Putting these points together for a museum would be for the staff
>to collectively define the goal for each exhibit as to what they hope
>to achieve, at what cost, and in what time frame, and then get on with
>it together.
>
>John Bing
>Laguna Beach, CA
>
>On Sat, 19 Jun 1999 12:30:13 -0600, Jay wrote:
>
>>Fellow Listers:
>>
>>We are considering adopting TQM or the "Total Quality Management"
>>philosophy at our facility.  We are a small but growing institution with
>>four full time and four part time staff.  There will be some expansion in
>>the near future which will require additional personnel as well spread out
>>the current staff.  We, of course, have been working as a team for quite
>>some time, but we are interested in this primarily from a visitor services
>>and resource management & allocation perspective.  Does anyone have any
>>experience with museums that have adopted TQM?  All thoughts on this
>>subject would be appreciated.  Thanks in advance...
>>
>>Jay Smith
>>Hutchinson, Kansas
>
>Important Subscriber Information:
>
>The Museum-L FAQ file is located at
http://museums.state.nm.us/nmmnh/museum-l.html. You may obtain detailed
information about the listserv commands by sending a one line e-mail message
to [log in to unmask] The body of the message should read "help"
(without the quotes).
>
>If you decide to leave Museum-L, please send a one line e-mail message to
>[log in to unmask] The body of the message should read "Signoff
>Museum-L" (without the quotes).
>

=========================================================
Important Subscriber Information:

The Museum-L FAQ file is located at http://museums.state.nm.us/nmmnh/museum-l.html. You may obtain detailed information about the listserv commands by sending a one line e-mail message to [log in to unmask] The body of the message should read "help" (without the quotes).

If you decide to leave Museum-L, please send a one line e-mail message to
[log in to unmask] The body of the message should read "Signoff
Museum-L" (without the quotes).

ATOM RSS1 RSS2