Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 1 Apr 1999 14:10:47 -0600 |
In-Reply-To: |
<v04011700b32931a8363c@[128.148.19.81]> |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
At 09:28 AM 4/1/99 -0500, you wrote:
>I think the first thing your colleague needs to do is stop using the phrase
>"Gen-X".
Agreed. I fit the demographic, but absolutely detest the label. It just
sounds like it came out of a soft-drink commercial or something.
Timothy Reed
Office of the State Archaeologist of Iowa
University of Iowa
[log in to unmask]
At 09:28 AM 4/1/99 -0500, you wrote:
>I think the first thing your colleague needs to do is stop using the phrase
>"Gen-X". I understand that it is useful in discussing demographics, but
>most of us truly believe we are not defined by Douglas Coupland. If this
>phrase is used at all in programming or promotions it may deter the very
>visitors it is targeting.
>
>Amanda Burdan
>
>
>>Pardon the corss-listings.
>>
>>A colleague is doing research on Gen-X support affinity groups and programs
>>which attract gen-Xers to museums. We are aware of a number of very
successful
>>efforts in art museums, but have not seen similar successes in history or
>>science museums or specialty museums. Anyone out there have some suggestions
>>about who to contact re Gen-X activities in those institutions?
>>
>>Mac West
>>Informal Learning Experiences, Inc.
>
>
|
|
|