MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Dill, Christopher L." <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 20 Jan 1999 12:42:00 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (37 lines)
     "Are you suggesting that NAGPRA is flawed?"

     Please don't put words in my mouth.  I never said that,
     and think that NAGPRA is a good law with quite well
     written regulations.

     I thought the phrasing of the original question:

     "...the question of whether aboriginal (indigenous)
     artefacts should or should not be returned to
     their rightful owners..."

     presumed that any aboriginal artifact in a museum
     collection must necessarily have a "rightful owner"
     other than the museum - this is a perception I often
     encounter, and with which I do not always agree.
     Perhaps the original poster should elaborate on what he
     meant so I don't misinterpret that.

     By "local law," I meant local to the situation - in the
     USA NAGPRA is the law, and I have worked hard to be
     sure that we are in compliance with the letter and
     spirit of the Act.

     Chris Dill

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
C. L. Dill, Museum Director
State Historical Society of North Dakota
612 East Boulevard
Bismarck  ND  58505-0830    USA
P: (701)328-2666
F: (701)328-3710
E:  [log in to unmask]
Visit our Web site at: http://www.state.nd.us/hist/
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

ATOM RSS1 RSS2