MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"William P. Scott" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 23 Jun 1998 11:59:53 -0500
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (31 lines)
Mr. Baron,

I am no expert . . . but I'm learning.  My sense of the situation that you
describe leads me to recite the copyright query mantra: "it depends."

I do not believe that publicity for an auction falls into the Fair Use
clause, nor any other loophole.  It all depends on the agreement that the
dealer and the artist reach.

A contract (license of copyright) should be
put together that states what is allowed to be copied, for what purposes,
and for how long.  As I understand it, without such an agreement, the
owner of the Picasso could refuse to allow you to copy and publish
photographs of the painting altogether.  They own copyright to the
work, after all (or, at least, I am assuming so much).

Best wishes,

William Scott

__________________________________________
William Philip Scott                     |
Collections Manager and Office Assistant |
Mathers Museum of World Cultures         |
Indiana University                       |
601 East Eighth Street                   |
Bloomington, IN 47405                    |
Email: [log in to unmask]                |
                                         |
------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2