MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Nicholson, Claudia" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 13 Aug 1998 13:05:27 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (37 lines)
You can probably find the most compelling arguments in A Legal Primer on
Managing Museum Collections by Marie Malaro.  Simply put, accepting
restrictions on gifts can tie the hands of your successors in ways that
you simply cannot foresee [and a great many that you probably can!]

Claudia Nicholson
Curator
Museum Collections Department
Minnesota Historical Society
345 Kellogg Blvd. W.
St. Paul, MN  55102-1906
  e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
  Phone:  651-297-7442
  FAX:  651-297-2967

> ----------
> From:         Starlyn D'Angelo[SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent:         Thursday, August 13, 1998 7:34 AM
> To:   [log in to unmask]
> Subject:      Donor agreements
>
> What are your strongest arguments for upholding the "no strings
> attached"
> policy for donations to museum collections?
> I am a young professional and occassionally I find that I must back up
> my
> opinions with hard facts or the words of others before people listen
> to me.  I insist that no professional museum promises donors permanent
> display of an object (this is noted several times in the
> Museum-L archives but no rationale is provided).  I need the words of
> other
> professionals to back me up.  Thanks for your help.
>
> Starlyn D'Angelo, Curator
> Old Stone Fort Museum Complex
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2