Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - MUSEUM-L Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
MUSEUM-L Home MUSEUM-L Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Database systems for archives with images
From:
jennifer nuske <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 21 Jun 1998 21:52:06 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Reply-To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
I am posting the following for a friend.
Please reply to list or to [log in to unmask]

RE: Database systems for  archives with images

Does any one  - particularly in Australia or New Zealand have a
preference/experience for database systems when dealing with a
predominantly archival collection. I have spoken with some people using
Inmagic, and Vernon. I am interested to hear comments on pros and cons
regarding use in a largely photographic and document collection. We are
investigating options for a collection with over 7,000 items. We will be
scanning in the photographic images, so a system which is friendly to
images is preferred. I have used Inmagic with a digital camera, but with
a more object based collection.  Any comments or suggestions would be
appreciated and looked into.

Thanks Nina Siers

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV