MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Ross Weeks <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 25 Jul 1997 17:14:00 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
I'm not sure anyone has really suggested that AAM or some other
organization set a national salary "standard" in the sense of a useless
mandate in the museum field.  But benchmarks are not mandates, they are a
fact-based reflection of what the market is paying and that is all.
Legislators, state personnel offices, private trustees, donors, and
administrators can use this information or ignore it.

In Virginia, at least, the State salary rate for a graduate degreed
collections curator starts in the mid-30s plus excellent fringe benefits.
(In fact, the graduate degree isn't actually mandated if one has the
equivalent in terms of relevant experience).  The last I knew, an
entry-level file clerk/typist in any Virginia state agency earns $15K plus
excellent benefits.

Benchmarks would be of interest to those in the Dakotas and NYC who talk of
$15K and $23K as being acceptable.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2