I am interested in hearing points of view/experiences with various forms
of living history interpretation, specifically, costumed interpretation,
first-person, and third-person.  What type(s) does your site or museum
use?  Why have you chosen one over the other?  What advantages do you
see in using costumed interpreters, first-person, or third-person?   Do
you feel the use of costumed interpreters is declining or increasing?
How about first-person interpretation?

I have been doing a fair bit of reading in this area but would like some
human input in this research.

Thanks.
--
Kerridwen Harvey
Harvey Heritage Services
(819) 827-0762 (tel)         (819) 827-5613 (fax)
[log in to unmask]