Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - MUSEUM-L Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
MUSEUM-L Home MUSEUM-L Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Classification numbers instead of accession numbers?
Emily Nedell <[log in to unmask]>
Fri, 11 Jul 1997 15:53:55 -0500
text/plain (17 lines)
I would be interested in hearing from a Museum which uses classification
numbers instead of "accession numbers" (year.#) for organizing its
records and labelling purposes. We are in the process of automating our
collection and the director and I have been arguing back and forth about
the merits of doing it one way vs. the other. He wants us on a numeric
system so that all newspapers begin with a one number, lithostones
another number, wood engravings another, etc. I said that Museums don't
do it that way, and in my cataloging I am already assigning both
a physical description and subject headings/descriptors which would make
 this kind of numeric system redundant.

Thanks for your response.

Emily Nedell
Curator
Museum of Printing History

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV