Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 29 Aug 1997 17:30:56 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I'm SICK of the "who has time" argument. Everybody has the same amount of
available time, but some are much better at assigning priorities than others.
I won't discuss WHY here. Everyone can assess that for himself.
george
==================
>
>Hugh,
>
>I've worked in small-medium history museums for 7 years now and agree
>with you that (often) the intellectual content of U.S. conferences (as
>opposed to case studies, how to's, fundraising info, public awareness,
>etc.) and in various publications is often lacking. Coming from the
>background that I do of understaffed, overworked and underfunded
>institutions, I'm not surprised. Who among us has time to write, much
>less research, a scholarly article? Aren't we all struggling to manage
>our workloads, keep on top of professional standards, and obtain funding
>to keep our institutions solvent? Perhaps (and this is only a guess),
>some of the countries you mention have stronger public (i.e. gov't)
>support of their institutions, thereby unloading staff of the onerous
>tasks related to fundraising and p.r. I also feel that AAM is doing a
>wonderful job at being our advocates with a government that increasingly
>attacks the nonprofit world. While I think it's a shame that few of us
>have the opportunities to do more "thinking" and publishing, perhaps we
>should be glad that someone somewhere is and take advantage of it--and
>support the AAM's efforts in protecting museums because until we have
>the public's (again, i.e. the gov't's) support we will always be
>struggling to keep our doors open.
>
>Stacey Otte
>Collections Manager
>Catalina Island Museum
>[log in to unmask]
>
>
|
|
|