MUSEUM-L Archives

Museum discussion list

MUSEUM-L@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
David Haberstich <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 1 Jul 1997 11:12:08 EDT
In-Reply-To:
note of 06/30/97 02:57
Comments:
Converted from OV/VM to RFC822 format by PUMP V2.2X
Reply-To:
Museum discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines)
 Diane Brenner, your response is just what I was looking for. I agree
completely with your concept of stock photo value for negatives. It
isn't just that collector value is irrelevant, however, but that "fair
market value" is relative to the type of purchaser selected by the
appraiser as a guidepost. If a commercial photographer would pay a
higher amount than a collector, certainly that's the market in which
potential buyers should be sought for an appraisal. In other instances,
collectors' purchase history might produce a higher value. Anyway, I
appreciate your response and am glad to know that there is precedent for
reasonable appraisals based on the value of negatives to photographers
as a business investment. --David Haberstich

ATOM RSS1 RSS2